David,
Thanks for the
information. We currently don’t have Neuros blowers as an option in the
MBR RFQ/RFP package, due to the expense of the blowers, but we still plan to
look into this option and could change the MBR system scope later if the City
decides it wants Neuros blowers. I think the first step is to talk to the
PUD to see how much of the capital cost they would be willing to pay for the
City to have the more efficient blowers, and then perform a preliminary life
cycle cost analysis. If the numbers come out relatively close or in favor
of the Neuros blowers, the City can then decide if that is what they want to
specify.
On a related subject,
we currently have a fixed grid diffuser system specified in the MBR RFQ/RFP
package. I know you have a strong preference for the retrievable diffuser
racks. However, the arrangement of diffusers in those racks is quite
dense, such that the air would not be evenly distributed throughout the basins
without supplemental mixing. This would require the use of mixers in the
aerobic zone (additional equipment and energy) to distribute the air.
Also, the aerobic zone would then be completely mixed. To obtain similar
treatment as a plug flow aeration basin, the aerobic zone would need to be
compartmentalized into two or three cells with baffles, and each cell would need
its own mixer. The alternative is to have a fixed diffuser grid that
distributes the air and provides enough air to keep solids in suspension,
allowing for plug flow in a single long aerobic zone. As you are aware,
the tank would need to be drained (we would include a sump, guide rails, etc. to
drop a submersible pump to dewater the tank back to the EQ basin) to gain access
to the fixed diffuser grid. Also, Aqua-Aerobics is the only manufacturer
that we’ve been able to identify so far that manufactures diffuser racks that
are retrievable with a small davit crane that can be hand or motor
operated. It is not clear at this time if they will provide those
diffusers separately from their package SBR system. We recommend
specifying a fixed grid diffuser system in the MBR RFQ/RFP package. This
does not preclude making a change later if the City decides to stick with the
retrievable diffuser racks and would represent a deduct, rather than an addition
to the original proposal price. As part of the proposal alternate, we’ve
allowed them the option to make use of those existing diffusers if they so
choose. Furthermore, there could still be a use for those diffuser racks
in the aerobic digesters, particularly if supplemental mixing is included to
enhance denitrification.
Tom
Giese
From: David
Randolph [mailto:drandolph@ci.arlington.wa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 3:32
PM
To: James Kelly;
Cc: Randy Norman; Tom Giese
Subject: Neuros Blowers
Good
day,
Randy and myself took
a tour of the Renton WWTP today to look at the Neuros Blower. It is
Randy's and my opinion that we should look into the feasibility of using the
system. The following are some of the pro and cons that we
saw.
Pros
Cons
If you have any
questions let Randy or myself know.
Thank
you
David B.
Randolph
Wastewater
Utility Supervisor
City of
(360)
403-3515